CHRIS LEYVA
  • Home
  • Plays
  • Writers Get Animated
  • About
  • Home
  • Plays
  • Writers Get Animated
  • About

What's It About?

11/25/2013

 
A week and a half ago, I submitted plays to 3 contests and opportunities. I had a rough time getting my bearings around the process of cover letters, resume, and writing samples together. I used to have a database of theatres and contests with all their information and deadlines and requirements, and I had a whole system of organization on my computer for documenting each submission and creating all those cover letters. I had templates built and everything. I was out of practice and it took me a while for me to get my bearings.


The hardest part for me was creating a synopsis for my play Books & Bridges. I haven't called it "finished" in my mind, so I haven't had a chance to write the synopsis. Or haven't really thought about it. I struggle with writing synopses, so being out of practice exacerbated my struggle.

The struggle comes from trying to get across not just the plot, but the mood of the piece, while making an argument as to why someone should care about the play enough to produce, watch, or even simply read the play. So, I try several opening sentences, trying to create a good "hook" or whatever. My hook used to be: "[Title of Play] is a [adjective] [genre] about [Character name] who is..."  That's a winning formula, right? 

A good synopsis would have to make you, yourself, want to see your play. With that in mind, I couldn't find a way to describe Books & Bridges. Was I struggling because I didn't know how to get the mood of the play into words or because I didn't really know what it was about? I thought I knew what it was about; I had even charted the main thrust of the play and the character arc for Julia my main character. Deep down, the play is about how a person defines herself. Life, work, school and life have defined who Julia is, but the play moves towards Julia taking ownership of and defining her "self." But that doesn't work in a synopsis. I tried. I started with "Julia doesn't know who she is anymore." But then I couldn't really define the plot of the play. The main concept/character arc didn't really allow for the plot description. At least not in an economical synopsis.


So, I concentrated on the plot of the play. What happens?
  1. Julia's mentor, Chuck, has opened a bookstore a few blocks away from another bookstore.
  2. Chuck's bookstore has been getting vandalized.
  3. Chuck skips town, leaving the store to Julia.

Those all happen before the play begins. That's where the play starts and it's crucial for that information to be out there for the rest of the plot to make sense. What happens after those "given circumstances" is what really tripped me up. Every time I started a new sentence, I questioned whether the plot I was describing in my synopsis was truly reflective of what actually happened in the play. The answer was "yes, but..." Yes, the plot was true, but the motivations and the "whys" weren't clear in the play.Writing the synopsis made me realize that I knew what happened in the play, but the motivations weren't well-defined, especially in the relationship of the two main characters. I think I should have tried to write the synopsis earlier, it would've helped me 2 rewrites ago. I feel like I need to scrap it and start over now that I have this fresh understanding.


For those curious, here's the synopsis for Books & Bridges:


"Julia Douglas has made a huge mistake. Her college writing professor, Chuck, has left her his bookstore as he skipped town to the wilderness of Montana. She enlists Dane, the one friend she still has in town to help pick up the pieces and sort through the mess that Chuck left behind. Adding fuel to the fire, the bookstore is being vandalized every day. Who’s to blame? Could it be supporters and customers of the bookstore down the street? Or could it be Betsy Holmes, the owner herself? Either way, Julia wants out. One way or another, she'll get out."

 


Role Reversals

11/8/2013

 
In preparing my submissions for several contests here in town, I started revisiting my plays I had written for 31 Plays, 31 Days. (I've kept them available on my site to read).

I've revised Palynology, A Town Called Opportunity/A River Called Solitude (now a combo), Lighthouse, Apoplexy, Salvage and some others that are a kind of experiment. A friend of mine suggested I take a look at several plays and see if, perhaps, they could be culled together into a single play. These plays are:
  • Fodder (Day 10)
  • Evocative (Day 11)
  • Androgynous Lust (Day 13)
  • Cutting Edge (Day 15)
  • Difference (Day 30)

The thing that brings these 5 plays together is having characters who all have semi-undefined and ambiguous relationships with each other. I used Fodder as the main skeleton, folding in each of the other plays and ending up with 3 characters. I found this amalgamating of these plays to be, on one hand, very exciting and, on the other hand, very troubling. In good playwriting, each character should have a distinct voice and vocabulary and speech pattern based on her past, her environment, her culture, her relationships with the other characters... If it was relatively easy to bring these plays together and turn 10 characters into 3, to take different roles and give them to different characters, (in some cases within the same scene, changing sexes, reversing roles), then had I done my job in the first place? Or had I created 10 generic characters with no real pasts or personalities? I did have to change a lot of the language, however, since things started to seem out of character, but the question remains: how distinct were the characters to begin with? 

I don't want to be too hard on myself about this since, you know, each play was written over the course a single day, so I forgive these rush jobs. Sometimes you have to go to the quarry to mine some stone before you are able to chisel it into something with true form and specificity. That metaphor makes me feel better.
    Picture

    Archives

    September 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    Much Older Archives

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Acting
    Alliance Theatre
    Auditions
    August Osage County
    Authorship
    Bathtime
    Book
    Breaking Bad
    Caryl Churchill
    CATCO
    Children's Theatre
    Collaboration
    Columbus Theatre
    Columbus Theatre
    Copyright
    Cowgirls Don't Ride Zebras
    Day Job
    Dialogues With Lars
    Directing
    Ending
    Fatherhood
    Hamilton
    Iowa
    Irene
    Joss Whedon
    Leak
    Little Shop Of Horrors
    Marketing
    Musical
    New Play
    Not There Anymore
    Outline
    Persephone
    Play
    Playwriting
    Popeye
    Prestige
    Process
    Rebecca Gilman
    Rehearsal
    Roger Rabbit
    Sacred Space
    Submission
    Synopsis
    Theatre
    The Woman
    Tony Kushner
    Woman Studies
    Work Life Balance